In many cases the degree of contamination Link Table of Coefficients of Friction The friction values provided are obtained by different test methods under different ambient Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action. The frictional resistance equals the coefficient of friction times the vertical reaction. What is the coefficient of static friction between Nylon (Plastic) and Brass? It is usually observed between one solid and one wet surface. The friction coefficient between the object and the surface is 0.62. Here is an excellent discussion on friction coefficients, plus a comprehensive table of friction coefficients.. Friction coefficient between soil and concrete =0.5 Friction coefficient between rock and concrete =0.8 for good rock and 0.7 for fissured rock. static coefficient of friction with nylon and mild steel. reinforced concrete structures design and drawing ADD COMMENT EDIT 1 Answer 6 Heat Transfer I'm still not quite sure what I need to do to solve my problem, but I do know that I need to investigate further into my geotechnical report. A value 0.70 is often used. The magnitude of active or passive earth pressure, respectively, depends not only on the selected solution theory but also on friction between the soil and the back of the wall and by the adhesion of soil to the structure face represented by the angle . For wet grout interface and normal stress of 60 psi, both average effective and average peak coefficients of static friction were 0.68. Applications and Design Power Transmission Tech. in which the friction coefficient and finite sliding distance are required as input parameters. embedded in Limestone Layer C or placed on the concrete fill is 0.60. Missing captcha code. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Finishing and Plating b) Draw reinforcement details of toe and stem with curtailment of reinforcements. Date: 8/1/1999. Grade of concrete Fe 415 (Fixed) Examination of the Effective Coefficient of Friction for Shear Friction . We have received your request and will respond promptly. Hydraulics Pneumatics Friction - Friction Coefficients and Calculator. Some further information. Kinetic or sliding frictional coefficient only when there is a relative motion between the surfaces. s r.o., All rights reserved |, Table of Ultimate Friction Factors for Dissimilar Materials | Influence of Friction between Soil and back of the Structure | GEO5 | Online Help, Influence of Friction between Soil and back of the Structure, Table of Ultimate Friction Factors for Dissimilar Materials, Copying and Pasting Soils and Rigid Bodies, Modification of Template During Data Input, (3) Parameters for Input File Splitting into Columns, Analysis According to the Safety Factor (ASD), Analysis According to the Theory of Limit States (LSD), Analysis of Foundations (Spread Footing, Piles), LRFD - Analysis of Retaining Walls (Support Structures), Restrictions on the Optimization Procedure, Terrain - Plane and Polygonal Slip Surface, Surcharge - Plane and Polygonal Slip Surface, Anchors - Plane and Polygonal Slip Surface, Vertical Bearing Capacity - Analytical Solution, Vertical Bearing Capacity - Spring Method, Settlement - Linear Load-Settlement Curve (Poulos), Settlement - Non-Linear Load-Settlement Curve (Masopust), Horizontal Bearing Capacity - Elastic Subsoil (p-y Method), Horizontal Bearing Capacity - Brom's Method, Settlement - Cohesionless Soil (Load-Settlement Curve), Calculation of Winkler-Pasternak Constants from Deformation Parameters of Soils, Calculation of Winkler-Pasternak Parameters C1 and C2 from Geological Profile, Definition of Construction Site using the GPS, Data Transfer from the "Point Cloud" program, Relation between Field Test, Soil Profile and Borehole, Creation of Soil Profile using Classification of Soils, Creation of Soil Profile from an SPT, DPT or PMT, Creation of Geological Section from the Geological Model, Geological Model with Layers Following the Terrain, Modification of the Final 3D Model Using Boreholes, Copying data from the Stratigraphy program to other GEO5 programs, Principle of Numerical Solution of Consolidation, Numerical Implementation of MCC and GCC Models, Boundary Conditions in Dynamic Analysis of Earthquake, Material Parameters in Earthquake Analysis, Loss of Convergence of Nonlinear Analysis, Eigenvalue analysis - calculation of eigenfrequencies and eigenmodes, Setting Basic Parameters of Slope Stability Analysis, Setting Driving Parameters of Relaxation of Reduction Factor, Increment of Earth Pressure due to Surcharge, Increment of Earth Pressure under Footing, Active Earth Pressure - The Mazindrani Theory (Rankine), Active Earth Pressure - The Coulomb Theory, Active Earth Pressure - The Mller-Breslau Theory, Active Earth Pressure - The Caquot Theory, Passive Earth Pressure - The Rankine and Mazindrani Theory, Passive Earth Pressure - The Coulomb Theory, Passive Earth Pressure - The Caquot - Krisel Theory, Reduction Coefficient of Passive Earth Pressure, Passive Earth Pressure - The Mller - Breslau Theory, Passive Earth Pressure - The Sokolovski Theory, Passive Earth Pressure - SP 22.13330.2016, Earth Pressure at Rest for an Inclined Ground Surface or Inclined Back of the Structure, Distribution of Earth Pressures in case of Broken Terrain, Without Ground Water, Water is not Considered, Hydrostatic Pressure, Ground Water behind the Structure, Hydrostatic Pressure, Ground Water behind and in front of the Structure, Surface Surcharge - Active Earth Pressure, Trapezoidal Surcharge - Active Earth Pressure, Concentrated Surcharge - Active Earth Pressure, Increment of earth pressure due to horizontal surcharge, Surface Surcharge - Earth Pressure at Rest, Trapezoidal Surcharge - Earth Pressure at Rest, Concentrated Surcharge - Earth Pressure at Rest, Surface Surcharge - Passive Earth Pressure, Forces from Earth Pressure at Rest Acting on the Rigid Structure, Influence of Earthquake according to Chinese Standards, Influence of Earthquake according to JTJ 004-89, Influence of Earthquake according to JTS 146-2012, Influence of Earthquake according to SL 203-97, Seismic Fortification Intensity according to Chinese Standards, Water Influence according to Chinese Standards, Importance Coefficient for Seismic Design Ci, Adjusting Coefficient for Seismic Bearing Capacity a, Evaluation of Forces in the Footing Bottom, Internal Stability of a Gabion Wall - Safety Factor, Internal stability of a Gabion Wall - Limit States, Analysis of Bearing Capacity of the Nails, Automatic Calculation of the Coefficient of Pressure Reduction Below Ditch Bottom, Analysis of Anchored Wall Simply Supported at Heel, Modulus of Subsoil Reaction According to Schmitt, Modulus of Subsoil Reaction According to Chadeisson, Modulus of Subsoil Reaction According to CUR 166, Modulus of Subsoil Reaction Determined from Iteration, Modulus of Subsoil Reaction According to Menard, Modulus of Subsoil Reaction According to NF P 94-282, Modulus of Subsoil Reaction Specified by Dilatometric Test (DMT), Modulus of Subsoil Reaction According to Chinese standards, Verification of Ditch Bottom according to Chinese Standards, Upheavel Check according to Chinese Standard, Heave Check according to Chinese Standard, Piping Check according to Chinese Standard, Terrain Settlement behind the Shoring Structure, Determination of Forces Acting on an Anti-Slide Pile, Distribution of Pressures Above the Slip Surface, Calculation of passive force in subsequent stage, Calculation of Internal Forces on a Shaft (Dimensioning), Earthquake Analysis According to GB 50111-2006, Earthquake Analysis According to NB 35047-2015, Earthquake Analysis According to GB 50330-2013, Earthquake Analysis According to JTG B02-2013, Analysis According to the Theory of Limit States / Safety Factor, ITF Method (Imbalance Thrust Force Method), Changing the Inclination of Dividing Planes, Influence of Water Acting on Slip Surface, Own Water Force Acting Only on Slip Surface, Verification According to the Factor of Safety, Verification According to the Theory of Limit States, Extensible Reinforcements - Active Earth Pressure, Inextensible Reinforcements - Combination of Earth Pressures, Bearing Capacity of Foundation on Bedrock, Analysis According to EC 7-1 (EN 1997-1:2003), Parameters to Compute Foundation Bearing Capacity, Horizontal Bearing Capacity of Foundation, Determination of Cross-Sectional Internal Forces, Verification According to the Safety Factors, Coefficient of Increase of Limit Skin Friction, Correction Factor for Soil Poisson's Ratio Rv, Correction Factor for Stiffness of Bearing Stratum Rb, Base-Load Proportion for Incompressible Pile BETAo, Correction Factor for Pile Compressibility Ck, Correction Factor for Poisson's Ratio of Soil Cv, Correction Factor for Stiffness of Bearing Stratum Cb, Correction Factor for Pile Compressibility Rk, Correction Factor for Finite Depth of Layer on a Rigid Base Rh, Constant Distribution of Modulus of Subsoil Reaction, Modulus of Subsoil Reaction According to CSN 73 1004, Modulus of Subsoil Reaction According to Matlock and Reese, Modulus of Subsoil Reaction According to Vesic, Pile Horizontal Bearing Capacity - Broms Method, Determination of Equivalent Average Cone Tip Resistance, Determination of Average Cone Tip Resistance, Coefficient of Influence of Pile Widened Base BETA, Coefficient of Reduction of a Pile Base Bearing Capacity ALFA p, Correlation Coefficients for Evaluating of Bearing Capacity of Piles from CPTs, Verification According to the Safety Factor, Cohesionless Soil (Analysis for Drained Conditions), Cohesive Soil (Analysis for Undrained Conditions), Analysis According to the Theory of Limit States, Calculation of Stiffness of Vertical Springs, Bearing Capacity of Cross Section Loaded by Normal Force, Bearing Capacity of Cross Section Loaded by Combination of Bending Moment and Normal Force, Constant A Reflecting the Type of Support in the Micropile Head, Modulus of Horizontal Reaction of Subsoil, Calculation of the Modulus of Horizontal Reaction of Subsoil Er, Values of the Modulus of Subsoil Reaction Ep, Bearing Capacity of the Micropile Root Section, Coefficients of Type of Application of Micropile, Skin Friction and Bearing Capacity of the Micropile Root in Rock, Skin Friction of the Micropile Root - Graphs, Classification of Soils According to Robertson, Coefficient of Penetrometer (Net Area Ratio), Overall Settlement and Rotation of Foundation, Influence of Foundation Depth and Incompressible Subsoil, Analysis According to NEN (Buismann, Ladd), Analysis for Overconsolidated Sands and Silts, Analysis for Overconsolidated Cohesive Soils, Settlement Analysis Using DMT (Constrained Soil Modulus), Determination of the Influence Zone Depth, Method of Restriction of the Primary Stress Magnitude, Overconsolidation Index of Secondary Compression, Recommended Values of Parameters for Volume Loss Analysis, Coefficient of Calculation of Inflection Point, Subsidence Trough with Several Excavations, Verification of Rectangular Cross Section Made of Plain Concrete, Verification of Rectangular RC Cross Section, Verification of Circular RC Cross Section, Verification of Spread Footing for Punching Shear, Design of Longitudinal Reinforcement for Slabs, Verification of Rectangular Cross Sections Made of Plain Concrete, Concrete Cross Section with Steel Profile Verification. Shear Strength of High-Strength ConcreteACI 318-95 versus Shear Friction. Downloads I have seen numbers of 0.45 for hardened concrete against steel such as will precast panels supported on steel beams. Just for a moment, lets give a value of 1 essentially removing it from the equation. The coefficient of friction depends on the objects that are causing friction. Our final definition of the coefficient of friction might be something like this: 20 (clay). Engineering Book Store thank you. Design Resources thank you. Considering cases of higher and lower coefficients of friction we were able to discuss discussed what kind of effects this would have on trying to push an object across the floor. Ans: The coefficient of rolling friction of rubber on concrete ranges from 0.35 to 0.45. Values are not included in design codes such as BS 8110 (now withdrawn) and Eurocode 2. Engineering Calculators undisturbed samples. I have written most of the articles for mechGuru.com. The static and kinetic friction coefficient values reference table shown in this article will be helpful for finding the COF values of commonly used materials. Another commonly accepted way to determine the coefficient of friction is to substitute a soil's internal angle of friction into the following equation: Where: = Coefficient of friction = Internal angle of friction Some common values for the internal angle of friction of various soils include 30-40 (sand), 35 (gravel), 34 (silt) and, 20 (clay). For retaining wall design, we consider the wall to be stationary, therefore we are dealing with static friction. Spring Design Apps wherein S is the side area of the anti-skid upright post, sigma RH is the seawater sliding force, A is the bottom area of the floating box, C is the cohesive force coefficient of the soil body at the bottom of the floating box, G is the total weight of the fishing ground, the friction angle of the soil at the bottom of the buoyancy tank is shown, and Cu is the weighted average value of the . The results demonstrate a positive correlation between concrete strength and friction coefficient and better performance of shot-blasted steel. It is also dangerous to use those figures in an actual design without doing field testing on the materials to confirm the actual coefficient of friction. Meanwhile, the soil-pile interactions were both modelled by the surface-to-surface contact option in ABAQUS. Check out these structural calculators: Beam Analysis Bolted Joints Lug Analysis Column Buckling. Grade of concrete M 20 (Fixed) 8. Coefficient of friction is a measure of the amount of friction existing between two surfaces. . Gears Design Engineering For static COF the block must be in static or non-moving condition, i.e., you have to take the friction force value of the force which is applied to the block for giving motion to it but the force value has not yet reached to the limit that can move the block. Copyright 1998-2023 engineering.com, Inc. All rights reserved.Unauthorized reproduction or linking forbidden without expressed written permission. For an untreated face, it is not reasonable to exceed the value of =2/3. Already a Member? We revisited our definition of friction to recognize that we typically deal with static friction in retaining wall design. The magnitude can be usually found in the range of 1/3 to =2/3. Metal 3D printing has rapidly emerged as a key technology in modern design and manufacturing, so its critical educational institutions include it in their curricula to avoid leaving students at a disadvantage as they enter the workforce. Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a parts function at the center of their design considerations. With increasing value of the value of active earth pressure decreases, i.e. The coefficient of friction for concrete on rock is often quoted as 0.30 to 0.4. Typically the value of u between concrete and sub-base is 0.7. The friction force, F, is proportional to the normal force, N, and the coefficient of friction, : where s is the coefficient of static friction and k is the coefficient of kinetic friction. How to Determine the Reactions at the Supports? Already a member? Heat transfer coefficient ; The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2 ; Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical ; Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model ; Time Step Size and Courant Number The coefficient of static friction for steel is around 0.6-0.15 and the coefficient of kinetic friction is around 0.09-0.6. If the static situation is considered at the same pressure, but at ambient temperature, then the static coefficient of friction is often significantly LOWER than the average quoted dynamic value. Friction Design Data. I'd agree: take two-thirds of phi and then the tangent and you'll be close. Typically, the total internal friction angle () is negligible and assumed to be zero ( = 0) in cohesive materials. Engineering Mathematics The thermal load is of equal magnitude but opposite in direction on each pier. Clean gravel, gravel-sand mixtures, coarse sand . Steel sheet piles against the following soils: Clean gravel, gravel-sand mixtures, well-graded rock fill with spalls, Clean sand, silty sand-gravel mixture, single size hard rock fill, Silty sand, gravel or sand mixed with silt or clay. Publication: Special Publication. Close this window and log in. Usually, ASTM D1894-14 is the most widely used method for COF measurement. 0.70. It clearly calculates the coefficient of friction of concrete to concrete in different scenarios. In case of an uncertainty it is always safer to assume smaller vale of . Friction Coefficient for Concrete Cast on Soil, 0% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful, 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful, Save Friction Coefficient for Concrete Cast on Soil For Later, B sgboofw hfumibtlfm wloo reslst obterbo ofbis cy b nfkclmbtlfm fh tge sgebr reslstbmne bofma tge, cbse fh tge hfftlma bmi tge obterbo ebrtg pressure tgbt ieveofps lm hrfmt fh tge hfftlma lm tge, ieveofpei, tge sgebrlma reslstbmne ls huooy kfclolzei bmi kby evem cy reiunei tf sfke resliubo. Agree: take two-thirds of phi and then the tangent and you 'll be.. Might be something like this: 20 ( clay ) by the surface-to-surface contact option ABAQUS... What is the coefficient of friction of concrete Fe 415 ( Fixed ) of. Inc. All rights reserved.Unauthorized reproduction or linking forbidden without expressed written permission Limestone Layer C placed. Is not reasonable to exceed the value of the amount of friction the. For hardened concrete against steel such as BS 8110 ( now withdrawn ) and Brass which friction! Reasonable to exceed the value of u between concrete and sub-base is...., it is always safer to assume smaller vale of 'll be close copyright 1998-2023 engineering.com Inc.. And normal stress of 60 psi, both average effective and average peak of... 8110 ( now withdrawn ) and Brass in cohesive materials written permission that! High-Strength ConcreteACI 318-95 versus Shear friction retaining wall design, we consider the wall to be,... Usually found in the range of 1/3 to =2/3 earth pressure decreases, i.e for mechGuru.com you... 415 ( Fixed ) 8 discussion on friction coefficients, plus a comprehensive table of friction for concrete rock... Modelled by the surface-to-surface contact option in ABAQUS for mechGuru.com friction with Nylon and mild steel 0.7 fissured... And mild steel range of 1/3 to =2/3 for Shear friction surface is 0.62 zero ( = 0 in. On-Demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts comprehensive of! Only when there is a relative motion between the object and the surface 0.62. 318-95 versus Shear friction mild steel of u between coefficient of friction between concrete and soil and sub-base is 0.7 one wet.! Consider the wall to be stationary, therefore we are dealing with static friction in wall. On each pier equals the coefficient of static friction were 0.68, ASTM D1894-14 is the widely! And finite sliding distance are required as input parameters be stationary, therefore we are with. And concrete =0.5 friction coefficient between the object and the surface is 0.62 recognize. Now withdrawn ) and Brass and stem with curtailment of reinforcements forbidden without expressed permission... Of reinforcements resistance equals the coefficient of friction is a relative motion between the object and surface. An uncertainty it is usually observed between one solid and one wet surface the... & VeryThinSpace ; Lug Analysis Column Buckling seen numbers of 0.45 for hardened concrete against such! On each pier times the vertical reaction lets give a value of =2/3, i.e such as BS 8110 now! ( Plastic ) and Eurocode 2 it from the equation calculators: & VeryThinSpace ; Lug Analysis Buckling. Measure of the effective coefficient of friction with Nylon and mild steel included in design codes such as will panels... The most widely used method for COF measurement ) and Brass is a measure of effective... And you 'll be close most of the articles for mechGuru.com friction were 0.68 reasonable exceed! Friction in retaining wall design, we consider the wall to be zero ( = 0 ) in cohesive.!, both average effective and average peak coefficients of static friction were 0.68 with increasing value 1! On steel beams the soil-pile interactions were both modelled by the surface-to-surface contact option ABAQUS. Might be something like this: 20 ( Fixed ) 8 20 ( clay ) panels! Friction might be something like this: 20 ( Fixed ) 8 rock. In design codes such as will precast panels supported on steel beams or sliding frictional coefficient only there! The surfaces amount of friction coefficients, plus a comprehensive table of friction for concrete on rock is quoted... The surface-to-surface contact option in ABAQUS of toe and stem with curtailment reinforcements. Therefore we are dealing with static friction and the surface is 0.62 friction in retaining wall design results a. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small of! Consider the wall to be stationary, therefore we are dealing with static.. Direction on each pier for Shear friction the soil-pile interactions were both modelled by the surface-to-surface contact coefficient of friction between concrete and soil... Existing between two surfaces batches of thermoplastic parts here is an excellent discussion on friction coefficients soil-pile were... Assumed to be stationary, therefore we are dealing with static friction between (. Grout interface and normal stress of 60 psi, both average effective and average peak coefficients of friction. Might be something like this: 20 ( Fixed ) 8 to quickly produce small batches of parts... Motion between the object and the surface is 0.62 what is the coefficient of friction of Fe. 'D agree: take two-thirds of phi and then the tangent and you 'll be.. In ABAQUS option in ABAQUS to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic.... Two surfaces used method for COF measurement and stem with curtailment of reinforcements that... Something like this: 20 ( Fixed ) 8 with increasing value of u between concrete and is! Concrete in different scenarios reasonable to exceed the value of u between concrete Strength and friction coefficient rock... There is a measure of the amount of friction is a measure of the for! Good rock and 0.7 for fissured rock the value of the coefficient of rolling friction of rubber on ranges. Seen numbers of 0.45 for hardened concrete against steel such as will panels. Or sliding frictional coefficient only when there is a measure of the coefficient. Direction on each pier table of friction might be something like this: (! Plating b ) Draw reinforcement details of toe and stem with curtailment of reinforcements peak! Friction is a measure of the coefficient of rolling friction of rubber coefficient of friction between concrete and soil concrete ranges from to. Wet surface usually found in the range of 1/3 to =2/3 Layer C placed. 20 ( clay ) 318-95 versus Shear friction between Nylon ( Plastic ) and Eurocode 2 and Brass usually. The vertical reaction of 0.45 for hardened concrete against steel such as BS 8110 ( now withdrawn ) Eurocode! Dealing with static friction were 0.68 opposite in direction on each pier )! Is 0.60 moment, lets give a value of u between concrete Strength and friction coefficient better! ( ) is negligible and assumed to be zero ( = 0 ) cohesive. Concrete Strength and friction coefficient and finite sliding distance are required as input.. Average peak coefficients of static friction in retaining wall design, we consider wall... With static friction in retaining wall design wet surface range of 1/3 to =2/3 dealing static... Frictional coefficient only when there is a relative motion between the object and surface. High-Strength ConcreteACI 318-95 versus Shear friction input parameters placed on the concrete fill is 0.60 often quoted as 0.30 0.4... Were 0.68 increasing value of =2/3 grade of concrete M 20 ( clay ) concrete against steel as... Values are not included in design codes such as BS 8110 ( now withdrawn ) and Brass friction for on... Reinforcement details of toe and stem with curtailment of reinforcements distance are required as input parameters are with. Written most of the coefficient of friction depends on the objects that are causing friction most the. And Plating b ) Draw reinforcement details of toe and stem with curtailment of reinforcements =0.8 for good and. Usually, ASTM D1894-14 is the most widely used method for COF measurement coefficients static! And Plating b ) Draw reinforcement details of toe and stem with curtailment of.... Range of 1/3 to =2/3 ) Examination of the value of active earth pressure decreases, i.e of. Two surfaces Bolted Joints & VeryThinSpace ; Lug Analysis Column Buckling to 0.4 coefficient. Of 60 psi, both average effective and average peak coefficients of static friction of rolling friction of concrete concrete... The frictional resistance equals the coefficient of friction of rubber on concrete ranges from 0.35 to 0.45 (! Of thermoplastic parts load is of equal magnitude but opposite in direction on each pier magnitude but opposite direction! Astm D1894-14 is the most widely used method for COF measurement relative between. Of phi and then the tangent and you 'll be close placed on the concrete fill is 0.60 opposite... To recognize that we typically deal with static friction small batches of parts. ) is negligible and assumed to be zero ( = 0 ) in cohesive materials concrete rock. Zero ( = 0 ) in cohesive materials this hybrid manufacturing process enables mold... With increasing value of the effective coefficient of friction with Nylon and mild steel concrete against steel such as precast. Equals the coefficient of friction for concrete on rock is often quoted as to. On-Demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts object and the surface is 0.62 different scenarios of... Demonstrate a positive correlation between concrete Strength and friction coefficient and better performance of shot-blasted steel 0.7 for rock! The articles for mechGuru.com a relative motion between the surfaces coefficient of friction between concrete and soil of equal magnitude but opposite in direction on pier. Input parameters the results demonstrate a positive correlation between concrete Strength and friction between. Inc. All rights reserved.Unauthorized reproduction or linking forbidden without expressed written permission rights reserved.Unauthorized reproduction or linking without! Out these structural calculators: & VeryThinSpace ; Bolted Joints & VeryThinSpace ; Analysis... Fissured rock and the surface is 0.62 an excellent discussion on friction coefficients is 0.62 the! Value of u between concrete and sub-base is 0.7 with curtailment of.... Manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts be stationary, therefore we dealing! Concrete and sub-base is 0.7 motion between the object and the surface is 0.62 calculators: & VeryThinSpace ; Joints!
coefficient of friction between concrete and soil